Optional.stream()

Technologist focusing on cloud-native technologies, DevOps, CI/CD pipelines, and system observability. His focus revolves around creating technical content, delivering talks, and engaging with developer communities to promote the adoption of modern software practices. With a strong background in software, he has worked extensively with the JVM, applying his expertise across various industries. In addition to his technical work, he is the author of several books and regularly shares insights through his blog and open-source contributions.
This week, I learned about a nifty "new" feature of Optional that I want to share in this post. It's available since Java 9, so its novelty is relative.
Let's start with the following sequence to compute the total price of an order:
public BigDecimal getOrderPrice(Long orderId) {
List<OrderLine> lines = orderRepository.findByOrderId(orderId);
BigDecimal price = BigDecimal.ZERO; // 1
for (OrderLine line : lines) {
price = price.add(line.getPrice()); // 2
}
return price;
}
- Provide an accumulator variable for the price
- Add each line's price to the total price
Nowadays, it's probably more adequate to use streams instead of iterations. The following snippet is the equivalent to the previous one:
public BigDecimal getOrderPrice(Long orderId) {
List<OrderLine> lines = orderRepository.findByOrderId(orderId);
return lines.stream()
.map(OrderLine::getPrice)
.reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);
}
Let's focus on the orderId variable: it may be null.
The imperative way to handle null values is to check it at the beginning of the method - and eventually throw:
public BigDecimal getOrderPrice(Long orderId) {
if (orderId == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Order ID cannot be null");
}
List<OrderLine> lines = orderRepository.findByOrderId(orderId);
return lines.stream()
.map(OrderLine::getPrice)
.reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);
}
The functional way is to wrap the orderId in an Optional. This is what the code looks like using Optional:
public BigDecimal getOrderPrice(Long orderId) {
return Optional.ofNullable(orderId) // 1
.map(orderRepository::findByOrderId) // 2
.flatMap(lines -> { // 3
BigDecimal sum = lines.stream()
.map(OrderLine::getPrice)
.reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);
return Optional.of(sum); // 4
}).orElse(BigDecimal.ZERO); // 5
}
- Wrap the
orderIdin anOptional - Find relevant order lines
- Use
flatMap()to get anOptional<BigDecimal>;map()would get anOptional<Optional<BigDecimal>> - We need to wrap the result into an
Optionalto conform to the method signature - If the
Optionaldoesn't contain a value, the sum is0
Optional makes the code less readable! I believe that readability should trump code style every single time.
Fortunately, Optional offers a stream() method (since Java 9). It allows to simplify the functional pipeline:
public BigDecimal getOrderPrice(Long orderId) {
return Optional.ofNullable(orderId)
.stream()
.map(orderRepository::findByOrderId)
.flatMap(Collection::stream)
.map(OrderLine::getPrice)
.reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add);
}
Here's the summary of the type at each line:
| Snippet | Type |
Optional.ofNullable(orderId) | Optional<Long> |
stream() | Stream<Long> |
map(orderRepository::findByOrderId) | Stream<List<OrderLine>> |
flatMap(Collection::stream) | Stream<OrderLine> |
map(OrderLine::getPrice) | Stream<BigDecimal> |
reduce(BigDecimal.ZERO, BigDecimal::add) | BigDecimal |
Functional code doesn't necessarily mean readable code. With the last changes, I believe it's both.
To go further:
Originally published at A Java Geek on February 21st 2021




